‘84% of British neurologists don’t view CFS as a neurological illness’ – survey results discussed | 9 April 2011

From the Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 9 April 2011

In Press

Papers, articles, editorials

Chronic fatigue syndrome: Labels, meanings and consequences
doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.02.002
Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624573
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 9 April 2011

Article in Press, Corrected proof

Wojtek Wojcik a, , David Armstrong b and Richard Kanaan a
a Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s
College London, London, UK

b Department of General Practice, King’s College London, London, UK

Received 20 December 2010; revised 31 January 2011; accepted 3 February
2011. Available online 9 April 2011.

Abstract

In this month’s issue, we report a survey of members of the Association of British Neurologists, which asked if they viewed chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as a neurological condition-84% of respondents did not. This is at odds with current classification in ICD-10. We discuss the difficulties of classifying CFS and myalgic encephalopmeylitis (ME), including historical and sociological factors, the pitfalls of the physical/psychological dichotomy and why classification matters to doctors and patients.

ME CONNECT HELPLINE

0344 576 5326

Available every day of the week between these times: 10am - 12noon, 2pm - 4pm and 7pm - 9pm.

Calls cost the same as other standard landline numbers (starting 01 or 02). If you have a call package for your landline or mobile phone then calls will normally come out of your inclusive minutes.