Psychologists criticise NICE guidelines for those with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
The British Psychological Society has criticised the recommendations outlined in NICE guidelines for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), ahead of judicial review which is due to begin this week.
The Society feels that the three therapies recommended by NICE in its guidelines (published in August 2007) do not recognise the multifaceted nature of CFS and the different ways in which individuals respond to this illness.
The Society is reiterating its comments in light of a judicial review which is expected to be submitted to court on Thursday 22 November by the One Click Health Advocacy Pressure Group. Although the Society has had no contact with this group, and is no way aligned to it, the Society has independently submitted its own concerns about the guidelines and feels they should be revisited.
Dr Ellen Goudsmit, who helped draft the Society’s response, said:
We believe psychologists have more to offer people with CFS and are disappointed that NICE rejected the alternative treatments we suggested, despite the fact that they were based on sound scientific evidence, including randomized controlled trials."
The Society wrote to NICE in August 2007 to voice concerns over:
- activity management, a way for people to manage their symptoms by learning to analyse and plan activities so that they can achieve more at home, at work and at leisure.
- graded exercise therapy (GET), which plans increases in activity or exercise, working towards goals that are important for the person with CFS/ME.
- The model of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) being recommended.
Dr Martin Crawshaw, Chair of the Society’s Professional Practice Board, added:
If psychology is to take over the majority of the work regarding the management of CFS patients then we need to be able to use our judgement."
Date: Friday 16 November 2007